The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed by Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Pakistan on August 7, has created a new strategic reality stretching from the Gulf to South Asia. Foreign Minister Khalilur Rahman has already indicated that Bangladesh would positively consider joining the pact, should there be an invitation. Law Minister Md Asaduzzaman has also said the government will decide whether Bangladesh will join the pact taking into account the overall situation. He, however, didn’t signal a decision in this regard.
Given its likely impact, the issue has, understandably, generated a debate stretching from the parliament floor to the tea stalls of remote areas. The defence agreement matters because it commits the three founding countries to collective defence: an armed attack against one is treated as an attack against all. Saudi Arabia brings considerable financial strength and geopolitical influence; Türkiye contributes a powerful military and a rapidly developing defence industry; and Pakistan brings substantial military experience and a nuclear deterrent. Together, they possess considerable strategic weight. However, calling the agreement an “Islamic NATO” may be premature. Unlike NATO, the new arrangement does not yet have a NATO-type institutional structure, integrated command system, or decades of operational experience. Analysts have also noted that its practical military mechanisms are still in the development stage. And, for Bangladesh, this distinction matters a lot.
Our foreign policy has traditionally sought friendship with all and hostility towards none. This approach is particularly valuable for a country whose economic and security interests are distributed among several competing powers. Bangladesh depends heavily on Western markets for its RMG exports, maintains important economic and strategic relations with China, has vital geographic and political links with India, and has deep economic and human connections with the Gulf. Millions of Bangladeshis work in Middle Eastern countries, while remittances remain crucial to the national economy. Bangladesh also needs Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Pakistan as important partners in different areas. Joining a military alliance, however, is fundamentally different from maintaining friendly bilateral relations.
The greatest complication may come from Bangladesh’s relationship with India. Pakistan is one of the three founding members of the Mecca pact. Bangladesh-Pakistan relations have improved considerably in recent years, but geography makes India indispensable to Bangladesh. Trade, transit, border management, water resources, energy, and regional connectivity all require a functioning relationship with New Delhi. A formal military alignment with Pakistan could therefore be interpreted in India as a major strategic shift. Reuters has already described the possible Bangladeshi membership as a test of Dhaka’s long-standing effort to avoid choosing between competing geopolitical camps. That does not mean Bangladesh should outright reject the Mecca initiative. In fact, there are several areas in which Bangladesh could benefit from closer cooperation with the three countries. These include military training, counter-terrorism efforts, intelligence sharing, maritime security, cyber security, disaster response, peacekeeping, unmanned systems, and defence technology. Türkiye, in particular, has developed a strong indigenous defence industry. Pakistan has extensive experience in military operations and defence production, while Saudi Arabia has both financial resources and a growing ambition to develop its domestic defence capabilities. A carefully designed partnership could therefore provide Bangladesh with opportunities beyond conventional arms purchases.
Additionally, Bangladesh should also look at the Mecca pact from the perspective of its own security priorities. Dhaka’s principal strategic concerns are not the same as Riyadh’s, Ankara’s, or Islamabad’s. It is more immediately concerned with the Bay of Bengal, maritime security, border management, terrorism and transnational crime, climate-related disasters, cyber threats, and the security of its trade and energy routes. If Bangladesh becomes a formal member of a collective-defence arrangement, however, it could potentially face expectations to support another member during a conflict far removed from Bangladesh’s territory. This is perhaps the most important question that Dhaka should ask before joining: would Bangladesh be prepared to accept a military obligation whenever another member of the pact is attacked at a far distance? The answer cannot be based on financial and strategic gains, sentiment, and the religious affinity of the people or temporary diplomatic enthusiasm. It must be based on Bangladesh’s national interest. There is another reason for caution. The Mecca framework itself is still evolving. Pakistan has recently indicated that the pact is open to new members and that any formal request would be considered in consultation with Saudi Arabia and Türkiye. On the other hand, the possibility of Iran’s membership is being actively discussed by many Muslim countries. This suggests that the institutional character and future membership of the pact have not yet been fully settled.
Dhaka should seek detailed clarification from the founding members on the pact’s military obligations, command arrangements, rules of engagement, financing, intelligence sharing, and the circumstances in which a member would be expected to provide military assistance. At the same time, Bangladesh should negotiate practical defence cooperation. It could seek joint training, maritime surveillance, cyber security cooperation, drone technology, defence education, and disaster-response capabilities. These are areas where cooperation could strengthen Bangladesh’s national security without unnecessarily narrowing its diplomatic choices. There is also a larger strategic principle at stake. The international system is becoming increasingly fragmented. States are forming new partnerships because traditional security arrangements are under pressure. The Mecca pact is one manifestation of that trend.
However, Bangladesh does not have to choose a geopolitical camp merely because other countries are doing so. Our strategic advantage has historically been our ability to maintain relationships with different powers simultaneously. That flexibility is particularly valuable for a country of Bangladesh’s size and economic structure. Therefore, Bangladesh should neither rush to join the Mecca pact nor dismiss it. It should engage actively, study its evolution, and negotiate from a position of confidence. If, in the future, membership can demonstrably enhance Bangladesh’s security, defence capability, and diplomatic influence without imposing unacceptable strategic costs, Dhaka can reconsider the membership. For now, the wisest course is strategic autonomy with active engagement. Bangladesh should keep the door open, but should not walk through it before knowing exactly where it leads.
Dr. Nasir Uddin Ahmed is a retired Major, researcher, and political and security analyst.
Views expressed in this article are the author's own.
Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries, and analyses by experts and professionals. To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.
