Bangladesh’s garment industry stands at a critical turning point. For more than three decades, the country built its economic success on low-cost manufacturing, efficient exports, and strong integration into global apparel supply chains. Today, Bangladesh is the world’s second-largest garment exporter, with the RMG sector serving as the backbone of exports, industrial employment, and foreign exchange earnings. But the global textile economy is changing rapidly. International buyers are no longer focused only on lower costs and production speed. Increasingly, they are seeking recycled raw materials, supply-chain transparency, lower carbon footprints, and circular production systems.
For Bangladesh, this shift creates both a challenge and an extraordinary opportunity. Ironically, part of that opportunity may already be floating in our rivers, clogging urban drainage systems, and scattered across city streets in the form of discarded plastic bottles.
Every day, thousands of waste collectors across the country recover used Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) mineral water and beverage bottles from homes, roadsides, canals and landfills. This informal recovery network operates quietly but remarkably efficiently. Local businesses clean and process these bottles into plastic flakes, much of which is exported abroad, primarily to countries with advanced recycling industries. Those flakes are then converted into polyester fibre and re-enter global textile supply chains. Sometimes, they even return to Bangladesh as recycled textile inputs at significantly higher prices.
In simple terms, Bangladesh exports waste and imports value-added fibre derived from the same material. From an economic perspective, this is difficult to justify. At the same time, Bangladesh spends billions of dollars annually importing cotton, polyester fibre, and textile raw materials. Yet, enormous quantities of recyclable material generated within the country remain underutilised.
The issue is clearly not an absence of waste. Nor is it a lack of entrepreneurial capability. The real problem is that Bangladesh has built world-class forward logistics but weak reverse logistics. This means that our supply chains work exceptionally well in one direction. Raw materials enter factories, garments move through ports, and exports reach global markets with remarkable efficiency. But modern industrial systems do not end with export. Materials must also move backward—to be sorted, recovered, reprocessed, and reintegrated into production. This backward movement is reverse logistics and, in Bangladesh’s textile sector, it remains fragmented, informal, and undervalued. Addressing this challenge is becoming increasingly urgent because the textile industry itself is changing.
Globally, human-made fibres now dominate textile consumption, while cotton’s share continues to decline due to rising water stress, climate risks and volatile commodity prices. Recycled polyester, much of which is derived from PET bottles, has become central to global sustainability transition.
Major brands including H&M, Zara, Adidas, and Nike are rapidly increasing the use of recycled materials based on climate commitments and circular economy targets. European regulators are also introducing stricter sustainability requirements regarding recycled contents, traceability, and waste reduction. Future export competitiveness will increasingly depend not only on labour cost, but also on environmental performance and material circularity.
Bangladesh can either continue treating plastic bottles and textile scraps as low-value waste streams, or it can recognise them as the industrial raw materials of the future.
Importantly, global investors are already beginning to recognise the latent value embedded in Bangladesh’s waste streams. One notable example is Recover, a Spanish textile recycling company that has expanded operations in Bangladesh in partnership with local industry players. Recover specialises in converting textile waste into recycled fibre suitable for spinning and garment manufacturing. The significance of such investment is that it signals how international organisations already see Bangladesh as a future hub for circular textile production.
The logic is straightforward. Bangladesh possesses one of the world’s largest concentrations of textile manufacturing and recyclable textile waste. Instead of exporting this material abroad for processing, international firms increasingly see economic value in building recycling capacity closer to the source of waste generation. This is precisely where Bangladesh’s opportunity lies.
The country already has industrial clusters, garment expertise, logistics networks, entrepreneurial capability, and an active informal recycling economy. Waste collectors and traders have already demonstrated that large-scale material recovery is possible when economic incentives exist. What remains absent is policy coordination and industrial integration.
Recycling and fibre-production machinery still face relatively high import duties compared to incentives available for conventional export manufacturing equipment. Waste segregation at the source also remains weak. Reverse logistics systems lack traceability and formal organisation. Dedicated sorting hubs and recycling infrastructure remain limited despite growing global demand for recycled textile inputs. This is where policymakers need to think differently.
Plastic waste should no longer be viewed merely as an environmental burden. It should be treated as strategic industrial feedstock for Bangladesh’s next-generation textile economy. Reducing duties on recycling machinery, supporting domestic recycled polyester production, encouraging municipal segregation systems, and investing in organised recycling zones could help retain significant economic value within the country. At the same time, informal waste workers must be integrated into future systems rather than displaced by them. Thousands of livelihoods already depend on bottle and waste collection. Formalisation should improve safety, income stability, and operational efficiency while preserving the economic role these workers already play.
The benefits of building a circular textile ecosystem extend far beyond environmental improvement. Domestic recycling can reduce dependence on imported raw materials, ease pressure on foreign exchange reserves, create new industrial jobs, and strengthen Bangladesh’s long-term position in global supply chains. Reverse logistics could itself become a major growth sector involving transportation, sorting, warehousing, recycling, and material traceability services.
Most importantly, this transition aligns environmental necessity with economic opportunity. In the past, Bangladesh transformed itself into a global garment powerhouse by investing in ports, industrial zones, logistics systems, and export infrastructure. The next phase of competitiveness may depend on whether the country can build the reverse systems required for a circular economy.
The world is gradually moving towards textile systems where waste becomes raw material. The countries that learn to recover value from waste will shape the future of global textile trade. Bangladesh still has time to become one of them.
Ahamedul Karim Chowdhury is adjunct faculty member at Bangladesh Maritime University.
Views expressed in this article are the author's own.
Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries, and analyses by experts and professionals. To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.
